Prenatal learning: Do "pregnancy foods" affect children's eating preferences?
© 2009 - 2013 Gwen Dewar, Ph.D., all rights reserved
Opportunities for prenatal learning
A fetus begins swallowing amniotic fluid at around 12 weeks, and by 28 weeks, an unborn baby is developing a powerful sense of smell (de Vries et al 1985).
So might babies learn about odors and flavors before they are born?
The phenomenon has been documented in rodents and rabbits (Bilko et al 1994; Hepper 1988). And there’s evidence for prenatal learning in humans as well.
For instance, babies recognize the smell of their own amniotic fluids immediately after birth. Given the choice, newborns prefer breasts that have been dabbed with fluids from their amniotic sac (Varendi et al 1996).
But babies lose their preference for the scent of amniotic fluid within a few days after birth. What about long-term effects? Can prenatal learning influence baby behavior weeks--even months--after birth?
The evidence suggests that it can. And that might mean that a mother's diet during pregnancy can shape the food preferences of her children -- for good or for ill.
In one experiment, Julie Mennella and her colleagues asked 46 pregnant women to follow one of three regimens:
• Drink carrot juice during the pregnancy and stop after the baby is born
• Drink water during the pregnancy and begin drinking carrot juice after the baby is born
• Avoid carrot juice before and after the pregnancy (i.e., drink water only)
The “carrot juice during pregnancy only” condition permitted researchers to test for the effects of flavored amniotic fluid.
The “carrot juice after pregnancy” condition allowed researchers to test for the effects of consuming breast milk that may carry the flavor of carrots.
More than five months after the babies were born--when the babies were just starting to eat cereal, their first solid foods--the researchers tested the infants’ flavor preferences.
They gave the babies two kinds of cereal, plain and carrot-flavored.
Would the babies exposed to carrots in utero prefer carrot-flavored cereal? They seemed to.
Compared with their reactions to plain cereal, the prenatally-exposed babies made fewer negative facial expressions while they ate carrot-flavored cereal (Mennella et al 2006).
The results were similar for the babies who had been exposed to carrot-flavored breast milk. But there was no effect observed for babies whose mothers had never drank carrot juice.
Can prenatal learning put kids at risk for bad habits?
It seems that prenatal learning about food has long-term effects, and this might help babies get over their initial resistance to eating healthful, new foods.
But the effect may have a dark side, too. Studies show that rodents exposed to alcohol in utero are more attracted to alcohol-tainted water after they are born. In fact, newborn rats show as much attraction to the odor of alcohol as they do to the smell of their own amniotic fluid (Abate et al 2008).
For obvious reasons, no one has ever done a comparable experiment on humans. But one observational study suggests that babies born to women who drank moderate amounts of alcohol during pregnancy have more pleasurable reactions to the smell of alcohol (Faas 2001).
And several epidemiological studies have found a link between fetal alcohol exposure and alcoholism later in life--even when researchers controlled for genetics and postnatal environmental factors (see Abate et al 2008 for a review).
So in addition to the dangers that alcohol poses for fetal health and brain development, it appears that prenatal alcohol exposure might give babies a lasting taste for alcohol.
Prenatal learning about junk food?
This makes me wonder how other bad habits might affect baby taste preferences.
Research on rats suggests that a pregnancy diet of high-fat, high-sugar foods (including potato chips and jelly doughnuts) might affect the food preferences of babies (Bayol et al 2007).
And other studies have found that feeding pregnant rats high-fat, high-sugar "junk" food -- like cookies, cheese puffs, sweetened breakfast cereals, and processed meats -- altered the reward system of their offsprings' brains.
Compared to rat pups whose mothers ate a standard, healthful diet, the "junk food" pups developed opioid-signalling (reward) pathways that were less sensitive to junk food triggers. As a result, these pups would have to eat more sugary, high-fat food to get the same "rush" of dopamine that makes eating such food so pleasurable (Ong and Muhlhausler 2011; Gugusheff et al 2013).
But in these studies, rat mothers ate "junk" food every day throughout their pregnancies.
It should also be noted that the carrot juice study involved the daily consumption of carrot juice.
If the women had drunk carrot juice only 2-3 times a month, would their babies have responded the same way?
We just don’t know. But I suspect that pregnant women eating otherwise healthful diets don’t have to worry that the occasional jelly doughnut will program their babies to love junk food. What we ought to be cautious about is the regular consumption of alcohol and sugary, high-fat, processed foods.
What else do babies learn in the womb?
Studies reveal that newborn babies can distinguish their mothers' voices from those of other women. And experiments have shown that babies are also born with a preference for certain speech rhythms--those matching the language of their mothers. So it seems that fetuses are listening to their mother's voices before they are born.
You can read more about
these clues to prenatal learning in my article "The social world of the newborn."
And more for information about what shapes baby's feeding preferences, see my article about
flavors in breast milk and formula
as well as this article about
getting babies to eat new foods.
References: Prenatal learning of food preferences
Abate P, Pueta M, Spear NE, and Molina JC. 2008. Fetal learning about ethanol and later ethanol responsiveness: evidence against "safe" amounts of prenatal exposure. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 233(2):139-54.
Bayol SA, Farrington SJ, and Stickland NC. 2007. A maternal 'junk food' diet in pregnancy and lactation promotes an exacerbated taste for 'junk food' and a greater propensity for obesity in rat offspring. Br J Nutr. 98(4):843-51.
Bilko A, Altbacker V, and Hudson R. 1994. Transmission of food preference in the rabbit: The means of information transfer. Physiology and Behaviour 56: 907-912.
de Vries JIP, Visser GHA, and Prectl IIFR. 1985. The emergence of fetal behaviour II. Quantitative aspects. Early Human Devel 12:99-120.
Gugusheff JR, Ong ZY, and Muhlhausler BS. 2013. A maternal "junk-food" diet reduces sensitivity to the opioid antagonist naloxone in offspring postweaning. FASEB J.27(3):1275-84.
Hepper PG. 1988. Adaptive fetal learning: prenatal exposure to garlic affects postnatal preference. Animal Behav 36:935-6
Mennella JA, Jagnow CP, Beauchamp GK. 2001. Prenatal and Postnatal Flavor Learning by Human Infants. Pediatrics. 107(6):E88.
Ong ZY and Muhlhausler BS. 2011. Maternal "junk-food" feeding of rat dams alters food choices and development of the mesolimbic reward pathway in the offspring. FASEB J. 25(7):2167-79
Varendi H, Porter RH, Winberg J. 1996. Attractiveness of amniotic fluid odor: evidence of prenatal olfactory learning? Acta Paediatr. 85(10):1223-7.
content last modified 4/13